Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Context of Changing Regional Geopolitics
https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-341-360
Abstract
The article analyzes the changes in the South Caucasus associated with the results of the Armenian-Azerbaijani hostilities in the fall of 2020. According to the author, a radical breakdown of the geopolitical configuration of the region took place. The long-term ethnopolitical conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is a thing of the past, the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (Republic of Artsakh) practically ceased to exist. For the first time in 30 years, Russian peacekeepers have returned to these lands. The role of Turkey, a longtime arbiter of Caucasian affairs, has been revived. An end has been put in the most important of the interethnic conflicts that have destroyed the USSR since the late 1980s. And it was Russia who did it.
As a result, each of the two republics controls only its internationally recognized territories, while Karabakh continues to exist de facto under the control of Russian peacekeepers. The decisiveness of V. Putin, who took upon himself the rescue of the civilian population and the settlement of the conflict, his ability to “persuade” irreconcilable enemies to stop the war and agree with the subsequent “peacekeeping intervention” contributed to a noticeable increase in Russia’s prestige in the region. However, the role of an independent arbiter capable of solving “insoluble” problems is impossible without strong political, legal, economic and military positions in the region. Therefore, the expansion of the Russian presence in the Transcaucasus is a factor of strategic importance that meets the national interests of Russia. The author believes that given the dismissive and consumerist attitude of the ruling elite of Armenia towards Russia, the time has come to adjust the choice of strategic partners in the South Caucasus. Azerbaijan is actively cooperating with Russia in key areas of world politics. One of the examples is the creation on the initiative of I. Aliyev of new formats of trilateral diplomacy in the composition of Azerbaijan-Turkey-Russia and Azerbaijan-Iran-Russia. An equally significant example is cooperation with Baku within the framework of the “Caspian Five”.
Taking into account the specifics of the “multi-vector” nature of the South Caucasian states, it is advisable to conduct constant monitoring of Russian approaches to relations with them from the point of view of equal and pragmatic cooperation. This will make it possible to avoid that the resulting vacuum will be occupied by other powers that have been making themselves known more and more in recent years. Therefore, it is vitally important for Moscow that the authorities of the South Caucasus take into account its political interests.
About the Author
S. I. ChernyavskiyRussian Federation
Stanislav I. Chernyavskiy, Doctor of Science in History
bld. 76, Prospect Vernadskogo Str., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Gadzhiev K.S. Geopolitics of the Caucasus. Moscow: International relations; 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)
2. Semedov S.A. The current geopolitical situation in the Caucasus. Moscow: Econ-Inform; 2008. 236 p. (In Russ.)
3. Ismayilov E. Essays on the history of Azerbaijan. Moscow: Flint; 2010. 330 p. (In Russ.)
4. History of the Armenian people from ancient times to the present day. Under. ed. M.G. Nersisyan. Yerevan: Yerevan University Press; 1980. 458 p. (In Russ.)
5. Musabekov R. The Karabakh factor in the foreign and domestic policy of Azerbaijan // Caucasian Neighborhood: Turkey and the South Caucasus. Yerevan: Institute of the Caucasus; 2008. pp. 84-100. (In Russ.)
6. Mehdiev E. The role of the OSCE in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Observer. 2008;10:53-62. (In Russ.)
7. Gasimly M.J. Aggression of Armenia against Azerbaijan. Diplomatic Efforts to Resolve the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (1987-2009) // From Mayendorf to Astana: Principal Aspects of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow State University. M. Lomonosov; 2010. p. 226-229. (In Russ.)
8. Terrorist attack in the parliament of Armenia on October 27, 1999. 27th October. 2019. URL: https://ria.ru/20191027/1560213427.html [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
9. Madrid Principles — full text. Publication of the Armenian Research Centers. April 12, 2016. URL: http://www.aniarc.am/2016/04/11/madrid-principles-full-text/ [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
10. Kazimirov V.N. Peace to Karabakh. Mediation of Russia in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Moscow: International relations; 2009. 456 p. (In Russ.)
11. Chernyavsky S.I. Ten years of the history of Azerbaijan (2003-2013). Moscow: Flinta; 2013. S. 194-227. (In Russ.)
12. Grigoryan S.G. Armenian velvet revolution. Yerevan: Edith Print; 2018. 176 p. (In Russ.)
13. Iskandaryan A. Myth-making operation. What Russia has lost because of the second war in Karabakh. Carnegie Moscow Center, November 18, 2020. URL: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/83258 [Accessed: 04.05.2021] (In Russ.)
14. Simonyan M. Appeal to the Armenian authorities. Komsomol’skaya pravda. July 19, 2020. (In Russ.)
15. How Pashinyan provoked the war, which he eventually lost. 23 November. 2020. URL: https://vestikavkaza.ru/analytics/kak-pasinan-provociroval-vojnu-kotoruu-v-itoge-proigral.html [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
16. The President of Azerbaijan in the General Assembly on 24.09.2020 https://news.un.org/ru/story/2020/09/1386632 [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
17. Speech by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan on September 25, 2020 at the general debate of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly. URL: armspb.org›post/un_25-9-2020 [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
18. Statement by the Presidents of Russia, the United States and France on Nagorno-Karabakh. October 1, 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64133 [Accessed: 10.04.2020] (In Russ.)
19. Telephone conversation with Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan. 10 February. 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64146 [Accessed: 19.04.2021] (In Russ.)
20. Statement by the President of the Russian Federation on October 8, 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64180 [Accessed: 23.03.2021] (In Russ.)
21. Kharitonova A. Putin — on the situation in Karabakh: this is not a movie, this is a tragedy. 17 November 2020. URL: https://life.ru/p/1354728 [Accessed: 23.03.2021] (In Russ.)
22. Statement by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and President of the Russian Federation. November 10, 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64384 [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
23. Meeting on the solution of humanitarian issues in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh. November 13, 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64409 [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
24. Putin, Aliyev and Pashinyan began negotiations on Karabakh in Moscow on January 11, 2021. URL: https://tass.ru/politika/10433541 [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
25. Tynyankina N., Frolov A. Some results of the armed conflict in Karabakh in the fall of 2020. Russia in global politics. 2021;2:147-158 (In Russ.)
26. Tarasenko P., Kovalenko M., Krivosheev K., Khalatyan A. “Peaceful” scold, only amuse themselves. Kommersant. 14 July 2020. (In Russ.)
27. Putin: Turkish soldiers in Karabakh are a provocation, and Erdogan understood this. 17 November 2020. URL: https://ru.armeniasputnik.am/politics/20201117/25382494/Putin-turetskie-soldaty-v-Karabakhe---eto-provokatsiya-i-Erdogan-eto-ponimal.html [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
28. Features of Russian-Turkish monitoring in Karabakh. 17 February 2021. URL: https://sputnik-georgia.ru/columnists/20210202/250773580/Osobennosti-rossiysko-turetskogo-monitoringa-v-Karabakhe.html [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
29. It is extremely important for Azerbaijan to continue the policy of equidistance. 14 Marth 2021. URL: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/03/14/azerbaydzhanu-krayne-vazhno-prodolzhit-politiku-ravnoudalennosti-mnenie [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
30. The Prime Minister of Georgia suggested that Yerevan and Baku hold talks in Tbilisi. 30 September. 2020. URL: https://ria.ru/20200930/peregovory-1578003276.html?in=t [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
31. Iran has prepared a new proposal to resolve the conflict in Karabakh. October 29, 2020. URL: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9845875 [Accessed: 29.03.2021] (In Russ.) 29.03.2021] (In Russ.)
32. Details of the meeting of the President of Azerbaijan with representatives of the OSCE Minsk Group. 12 December 2020. URL: https://az.sputniknews.ru/politics/20201212/425702244/azerbaijan-prezident-aliyev-sopredsedateli-minsk-group.html [Accessed: 03.03.2021] (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chernyavskiy S.I. Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Context of Changing Regional Geopolitics. Post-Soviet Issues. 2021;8(3):341-360. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-341-360